Legislation Details

File #: 26-1159    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Request Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 9/3/2026 In control: City Commission
On agenda: 10/6/2026 Final action:
Title: ITEM(S) 1 - ACCEPTANCE OF A RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION BY 333 N SWINTON AVE. ITEM(S) 2 - ACCEPTANCE OF A RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION BY 617 SE 2ND AVE. ITEM(S) 3 - ACCEPTANCE OF A RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION BY 32 SW 5TH AVE. ITEM(S) 4 - ACCEPTANCE OF A RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION BY 322 NW 6 TH AVE. ITEM(S) 5 - ACCEPTANCE OF A RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION BY 709 ENFIELD RD. ITEM(S) 6 - ACCEPTANCE OF A RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION BY 625 ELDORADO LN. ITEM(S) 7 - ACCEPTANCE OF A RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION BY 629 ELDORADO LN. ITEM(S) 8 - ACCEPTANCE OF A RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION BY 112 N SWINTON AVE.
Sponsors: Public Works Department
Attachments: 1. Agenda Cover Report, 2. 1a - Right of Way Deed - 333 N Swinton Ave - Michael Coraggio, 3. 1b - Legal Review Right of Way Deed - 333 N Swinton Ave - Michael Coraggio, 4. 2a - Right of Way Deed - 617 SE 2nd Ave - KM One LLC, 5. 2b - Legal Review Right of Way Deed - 617 SE 2nd Ave - KM One LLC, 6. 3a - Right of Way Deed - 32 SW 5th Ave - Community Holdings I LLC, 7. 3b - Legal Review Right of Way Deed - 32 SW 5th Ave - Community Holdings I LLC, 8. 4a -Right of Way Deed - 322 NW 6th Ave - Jonah Fredrick Sr., 9. 4b - Legal Review Right of Way Deed - 322 NW 6th Ave - Jonah Fredrick Sr, 10. 5a - Right of Way Deed - 709 Enfield Rd - LVDG LLC, 11. 5b - Legal Review Right of Way Deed - 709 Enfield Rd - LVDG LLC, 12. 6a - Right of Way Deed - 625 Eldorado Ln - 4th Ave Equity LLC, 13. 6b - Legal Review Right of Way Deed - 625 Eldorado Ln - 4th Ave Equity LLC, 14. 7a - Right of Way Deed - 629 Eldorado Ln - 629 Eldorado LLC, 15. 7b - Legal Review Right of Way Deed - 629 Eldorado Ln - 629 Eldorado LLC, 16. 8a - Right of Way Deed - 112 N Swinton Ave - PICUTTRACY R TRUST, 17. 8b - Legal Review Right of Way Deed - 112 N Swinton Ave - Tracy R Picut Trust
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.

TO:                                          Mayor and Commissioners

FROM:           Missie Barletto, Director Public Works

THROUGH:                     Terrence R. Moore, ICMA-CM

DATE:                     October 6, 2026

 

Title

ITEM(S) 1 - ACCEPTANCE OF A RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION BY 333 N SWINTON AVE.

ITEM(S) 2 - ACCEPTANCE OF A RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION BY 617 SE 2ND AVE.

ITEM(S) 3 - ACCEPTANCE OF A RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION BY 32 SW 5TH AVE.

ITEM(S) 4 - ACCEPTANCE OF A RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION BY 322 NW 6 TH AVE.

ITEM(S) 5 - ACCEPTANCE OF A RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION BY 709 ENFIELD RD.

ITEM(S) 6 - ACCEPTANCE OF A RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION BY 625 ELDORADO LN.

ITEM(S) 7 - ACCEPTANCE OF A RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION BY 629 ELDORADO LN.

ITEM(S) 8 - ACCEPTANCE OF A RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION BY 112 N SWINTON AVE.

 

Body

Recommended Action:

Recommendation

Consideration of the following items:

Item 1 - Motion to approve and accept a Right-of-Way Dedication by the owners of 333 N Swinton Ave.

Item 2 - Motion to approve and accept a Right-of-Way Dedication by the owners of 617 SE 2nd Ave.

Item 3 - Motion to approve and accept a Right-of-Way Dedication by the owners of 32 SW 5th Ave.

Item 4 - Motion to approve and accept a Right-of-Way Dedication by the owners of 322 NW 6th Ave.

Item 5 - Motion to approve and accept a Right-of-Way Dedication by the owners of 709 Enfield Rd.

Item 6 - Motion to approve and accept a Right-of-Way Dedication by the owners of 625 Eldorado Ln.

Item 7 - Motion to approve and accept a Right-of-Way Dedication by the owners of 629 Eldorado Ln.

Item 8 - Motion to approve and accept a Right-of-Way Dedication by the owners of 112 N. Swinton Ave.

 

Body

Background:

Item 1

Consider acceptance of a Right-of-Way Dedication located at 333 N Swinton Ave.

The owner(s) submitted a building permit application for the subject property. During the application process it was determined that in accordance with LDR 5.3.1 (A) the alley at the rear of the property has an ultimate Right-of-Way of 20 ft. That corresponds to a half-width of 10 ft.  The current Right-of-Way half-width is 8 ft.  As a result, a 2 ft. Right-of-Way dedication was requested to satisfy the requirement.

 

There is no City cost now or in the future for these items.

 

Item 2

Consider acceptance of a Right-of-Way Dedication located at 617 SE 2nd Ave.

The owner(s) submitted a building permit application for the subject property. During the application process it was determined that in accordance with LDR 5.3.1 (A) the alley at the rear of the property has an ultimate Right-of-Way of 20 ft. That corresponds to a half-width of 10 ft.  The current Right-of-Way half-width is 8 ft.  As a result, a 2 ft. Right-of-Way dedication was requested to satisfy the requirement.

 

There is no City cost now or in the future for these items.

 

Item 3

Consider acceptance of a Right-of-Way Dedication located at 32 SW 5th Ave.

The owner(s) submitted a building permit application for the subject property. During the application process it was determined that in accordance with LDR 5.3.1 (A), the roadway has an ultimate Right-of-Way of 50 ft. That corresponds to a half-width of 25 ft.  The current Right-of-Way half-width is 20 ft.  As a result, a 5 ft. Right-of-Way dedication was requested to satisfy the requirement.

There is no City cost now or in the future for these items.

 

Item 4

Consider acceptance of a Right-of-Way Dedication located at 322 NW 6th Ave.

The owner(s) submitted a building permit application for the subject property. During the application process it was determined that in accordance with LDR 5.3.1 (A) the alley at the rear of the property has an ultimate Right-of-Way of 20 ft. That corresponds to a half-width of 10 ft.  The current Right-of-Way half-width is 8 ft.  As a result, a 2 ft. Right-of-Way dedication was requested to satisfy the requirement.

 

There is no City cost now or in the future for these items.

 

Item 5

Consider acceptance of a Right-of-Way Dedication located at 709 Enfield Rd.

The owner(s) submitted a building permit application for the subject property. During the application process it was determined that in accordance with LDR 5.3.1 (A), the roadway has an ultimate Right-of-Way of 50 ft. That corresponds to a half-width of 25 ft.  The current Right-of-Way half-width is 20 ft.  As a result, a 5 ft. Right-of-Way dedication was requested to satisfy the requirement.

There is no City cost now or in the future for these items.

 

Item 6

Consider acceptance of a Right-of-Way Dedication located at 625 Eldorado Ln.

The owner(s) submitted a building permit application for the subject property. During the application process it was determined that in accordance with LDR 5.3.1 (A), the roadway has an ultimate Right-of-Way of 50 ft. That corresponds to a half-width of 25 ft.  The current Right-of-Way half-width is 20 ft.  As a result, a 5 ft. Right-of-Way dedication was requested to satisfy the requirement.

There is no City cost now or in the future for these items.

 

Item 7

Consider acceptance of a Right-of-Way Dedication located at 629 Eldorado Ln.

The owner(s) submitted a building permit application for the subject property. During the application process it was determined that in accordance with LDR 5.3.1 (A), the roadway has an ultimate Right-of-Way of 50 ft. That corresponds to a half-width of 25 ft.  The current Right-of-Way half-width is 20 ft.  As a result, a 5 ft. Right-of-Way dedication was requested to satisfy the requirement.

There is no City cost now or in the future for these items.

 

Item 8

Consider acceptance of a Right-of-Way Dedication located at 112 N. Swinton Ave.

The owner(s) submitted a building permit application for the subject property. During the application process it was determined that in accordance with LDR 5.3.1 (A) the alley at the rear of the property has an ultimate Right-of-Way of 20 ft. That corresponds to a half-width of 10 ft.  The current Right-of-Way half-width is 8 ft.  As a result, a 2 ft. Right-of-Way dedication was requested to satisfy the requirement.

 

There is no City cost now or in the future for these items.

 

City Attorney Review:

Approved as to form and legal sufficiency.

Funding Source/Financial Impact:

N/A

Timing of Request:

The timing of these requests is of high importance to allow projects to continue construction.