File #: 24-1059    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Request Status: Passed
File created: 7/30/2024 In control: City Commission
On agenda: 9/16/2024 Final action: 9/16/2024
Title: REPORT OF APPEALABLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION ACTIONS FROM AUGUST 12, 2024 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 6, 2024.
Sponsors: Development Services Department
Attachments: 1. Agenda Cover Report, 2. SPRAB (8-28) 101 SE 2nd Avenue, 3. HPB (9-4) 228 NE 5th Street, 4. HPB (9-4) -824 E. Atlantic Ave, 5. HPB (9-4)-142 S Ocean Boulevard, 6. HPB (9-4)-Sundy Village Master Sign Program
TO: Mayor and Commissioners
FROM: Anthea Gianniotes, Development Services Director
THROUGH: Terrence R. Moore, ICMA-CM
DATE: September 16, 2024

Title
REPORT OF APPEALABLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION ACTIONS FROM AUGUST 12, 2024 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 6, 2024.

Body
Recommended Action:
Recommendation
By motion, receive and file this report for actions on development application requests from August 12, 2024 through September 6, 2024.

Body
Background:
This report is the method of informing the City of Delray Beach (“City”) City Commission of actions taken on site plan applications either by a City board or by the Development Services Director via administrative approval, which may be appealed by the City Commission, pursuant to Land Development Regulations (LDR) Section 2.1.3(F), Appealable Reports of Board Actions, and Section 2.4.10(A)(5)(b-c), Site Plan Applications. Administratively approved site plan applications are limited to fully code compliant Level 2 applications.

A staff report, along with associated exhibits and/or plans, provides a thorough description and analysis of each request. Items that appeared on a board’s agenda that are not listed below were not acted on by the board (i.e. continued with direction) or received a recommendation to the City Commission for final action.

Site Plan Review and Appearance Board
Meeting Date: August 28, 2024

1. Restaurant Conversion, 101 SE 2nd Avenue (2023-253)
Request: A Level 1 Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Architectural Elevations for a change of use to establish a restaurant within the existing approximate 6,600 sq. ft. building footprint.
Public Comment: No public comments.
Board Comment: The Board was generally supportive and overall discussion focused on utilizing the proposed drive aisle as a loading solution for the restaurant. Some Board members had concern over the loading area within the driv...

Click here for full text