Skip to main content
File #: 25-1215    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Request Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 9/16/2025 In control: City Commission
On agenda: 11/4/2025 Final action:
Title: REPORT OF APPEALABLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION ACTIONS FROM OCTOBER 15, 2025 THROUGH OCTOBER 24, 2025.
Sponsors: Development Services Department
Attachments: 1. Agenda Cover Report, 2. HPB (10-15) 250 Royal Court, 3. PZB (10-20) Delray Hyundai -Part 1, 4. PZB (10-20) Delray Hyundai -Part 2 (Architectural plans)
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.
TO: Mayor and Commissioners
FROM: Anthea Gianniotes, Development Services Director
THROUGH: Terrence R. Moore, ICMA-CM
DATE: November 4, 2025

Title
REPORT OF APPEALABLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION ACTIONS FROM OCTOBER 15, 2025 THROUGH OCTOBER 24, 2025.

Body
Recommended Action:
Recommendation
By motion, receive and file this report for actions on development application requests from October 15, 2025 through October 24, 2025.

Body
Background:
This report is the method of informing the City of Delray Beach (“City”) City Commission of actions taken on site plan applications either by a City board or by the Development Services Director via administrative approval, which may be appealed by the City Commission, pursuant to Land Development Regulations (LDR) Section 2.1.3(F), Appealable Reports of Board Actions, and Section 2.4.10(A)(5)(b-c), Site Plan Applications. Administratively approved site plan applications are limited to fully code compliant Level 2 applications.

A staff report, along with associated exhibits and/or plans, provides a thorough description and analysis of each request. Items that appeared on a board’s agenda that are not listed below were not acted on by the board (i.e. continued with direction) or received a recommendation to the City Commission for final action.

Historic Preservation Board
Meeting Date: October 15, 2025

1. 250 Royal Court (HP117-2025)
Request: Certificate of Appropriateness & Level 1 Site Plan application for exterior modifications on a non-contributing commercial structure.
Public Comment: No public comment
Board Comment: The Board made comments on the requested smooth stucco and how it would not match the exterior profile as the existing vertical wood siding. A simulated vertical stucco or a cementitious wood siding was preferred. The board also agreed that the muntins and navy window frame color should remain as staff had originally administrativel...

Click here for full text