Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Bookmark and Share
File #: 19-139    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Ordinance Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 1/28/2019 In control: City Commission
On agenda: 2/12/2019 Final action:
Title: ORDINANCE 09-19 (FIRST READING)
Sponsors: City Attorney Department
Attachments: 1. Agenda Cover Report, 2. Ordinance 09-19
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.
TO: Mayor and Commissioners
FROM: Lynn Gelin, Interim City Attorney
DATE: February 12, 2019

Title
ORDINANCE 09-19 (FIRST READING)

Body
Recommended Action:
Recommendation
Motion to approve Ordinance 09-19 amending Section 4.4.13 (K), “CBD Review and Approval Process,” and Section 4.5.6, “The West Atlantic Avenue Overlay District,” of the Land Development Regulations.
Body
Background:
Ordinance 09-19 seeks to amend section 4.4.13 and section 4.5.6 of the City’s Land Development Regulations (“LDR’s) that relate to the review and approval process of City applications for land development by various boards and committees. Currently, development applications must be reviewed by various boards and committees, some of which are not comprised of members appointed by the City Commission. Such groups are not subject to the open meeting requirements of the Sunshine Law.
This Ordinance deletes the requirement of review of projects by boards that are not subject to the Sunshine Law, specifically the West Atlantic Redevelopment Coalition (WARC) and the Pineapple Grove Design Review Committee. It should be noted that removing this requirement as a condition of the application process would not preclude members of these committees from conducting their own review and notifying the City. This change would no longer make such review mandatory. Residents and businesses affected by development requests would continue to receive notice of same and could participate in any public hearings held by either the City Commission or appointed advisory boards. Thus, the ability of any member of the public to speak for or against a project would still exist.
In addition, the portion of 4.4.13(K) mandating review by the DDA and CRA is also deleted. Review by the DDA and CRA is currently a requirement listed section 2.4.2(C)(1) of the LDR’s. Thus, by removing this portion of section 4.4.13, staff is merely streamlining the LDR's and removing portions that are duplicitous.
City...

Click here for full text